The 4-3 vote denying healthcare benefits to same-sex couples
by the Lakeland City Commission was a victory for the LGBTQ community. Yeah,
you read that right. That wasn’t a typo. The vote actually will do more good in
the long run for equality than had it passed. Why? Because now we have a reason
to fight. This vote gave a face to discrimination, and that face looks like Edie Yates, Phillip Walker, Howard Wiggs and Mayor Gow Fields. Over the
next week I will be writing a series of letters to the City Commissioners. If
you care about equality, I encourage you to join me.
Mayor Gow Fields, Lakeland, Florida |
Dear Mayor Gow Fields:
I am saddened by your vote against
equality for LGBTQ city employees. To be clear, it isn’t really your vote that
I take issue, but the reasons you gave for your vote—reasons that I feel fall
short of what I look for in an elected official.
I commend you and the Commission on your civility and
demonstrating, in your words, “how to disagree without being disagreeable”. If
any of my words come across as disagreeable, please know that is
not my intention, but in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter From
a Birmingham Jail, “We know through painful experience that freedom is never
voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” In MLK's case, many White moderate clergy were painting his actions as disagreeable,
but time has shown us who was on the right side of history. I hope that I write in that same tradition of justice demanding.
I have put your argument from the City Commission meeting in italics, with my thoughts
interspersed:
In the strongest possible terms, I absolutely
disagree that [not providing same-sex partner health benefits for city
employees] is discriminatory. We didn’t create the laws of marriage in this
country; they existed well before any of us were born… …We didn’t carve out
same-sex couples from this benefit. They existed before we got here. So to
suggest that we are being discriminatory is just not accurate.
Let’s talk about the laws of marriage that existed before
you were born. You were born in 1963—two years before it would be legal for
you, as a man of color, to marry a White woman. By your own logic, if we only consider the
laws of marriage before your birth in 1963, we would not offer benefits to
interracial partners. After all, it wouldn’t be discriminatory because we
didn’t carve them out of the benefit, and these laws of marriage existed before
you were born.
Continuing with your argument:
I could go into my personal beliefs on this
issue. God loves and accepts every last one of us. But he calls us to behave a
certain way. To follow the directives in the law that he has given us. And he
gives us the power to choose whether we do or we don’t. And everyone in here
will have to answer for that. We will each have to give our own account.
Here are the words of a Virginia Judge in the 1940s in his
upholding of the state’s ban on interracial marriage: "Almighty God
created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on
separate continents. And for the interference with his arrangement there would
be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that
he did not intend for the races to mix."
He too used God to support his convictions for inequality.
No disrespect meant, but it was bad theology then and your using God is bad
theology today. As an elected official, it is not your role to interpret
Scripture in order to set policy and law. That is a theocracy. It is your role in some cases to look out for the rights of the minority in spite of the attempts of an
oppressive majority to deny equality. The 14th Amendment of our
Constitution means something to me. It is the amendment that created our
present day society that allowed me to vote for you, a person of color, to
be my mayor. That "equal protection under the law” part extends further than
just the color of a person’s skin. So many government officials before you have used their distorted interpretation of Scripture to support
unequal protection under the law. It saddens me that you chose to do the same.
Continuing
with your argument:
…I have spent a lot of time listening to
both sides of the issue, but I haven’t listened to people who claim this is a
homophobic issue. I have coached gays and lesbians… …I have employed gays and
lesbians. So when someone says that I am homophobic, they haven’t walked a mile
in my moccasins.
Mayor Fields, I can’t call you homophobic… I don’t really
know you. However, someone knowing, coaching or employing a person who
identifies as LGBTQ is not the standard to determine if someone isn’t
homophobic. I think we both know many coaches, employers and even friends, who interact with people of color, who
we know to be racist. Myself, being a person of privilege (White, middle class,
educated, straight, clergy, male…) I constantly have to avoid getting defensive
and need to check myself, being aware of how I unintentionally participate in
cultural and institutional systems of racism. As a straight, high ranking
government official, I call on you to do the same—be slow to dismiss others
when they call you out on your privilege and be aware of how there are systems
alive and strong in Lakeland that create inequality for LGBTQ persons that you might unintentionally participate in.
When you finished your argument with “they haven’t walked a
mile in my moccasins,” the woman standing behind me, who identifies as a
lesbian, said, “Nor have you in mine.” That is an ironic phrase for you to end
with. Its origins are a Native American proverb used by a people oppressed by a
government that denied them of their rights and equal protection under the law,
simply because of who they were born to be. In all due respect, Mayor, you are
not the oppressed in this proverb. You are the person of privilege and power
denying equal protection under the law.
Sincerely,
Rev. Andy Oliver
Walk a Mile in My Shoes
Joe South, 1970
If I could be you, if
you could be me for just one hour
If we could find a way
to get inside each other's mind,
If you could see you
through my eyes instead of your ego
I believe you'd be
surprised to see that you've been blind,
Walk a mile in my
shoes, walk a mile in my shoes
Hey, before you abuse,
criticize and accuse
Walk a mile in my
shoes
Now your whole world
you see around you is just a reflection
And the law of common
says you're gonna reap just what you sow
So unless you've lived
a life of total perfection
You'd better be
careful of every stone that you should throw
[ Lyrics from:
http://www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/j/joe_south/walk_a_mile_in_my_shoes.html ]
And yet we spend the
day throwin' stones at one another
'Cause I don't think
or wear my hair the same way you do,
Well, I may be common
people but I'm your brother
And when you strike
out you're tryin' to hurt me it's hurtin' you
Lord, have mercy
Walk a mile in my
shoes, walk a mile in my shoes
Babe, before you
abuse, criticize and accuse
Walk a mile in my
shoes
And there are people
on reservations and out in the ghettos
And brother, there,
but for the grace of God, go you and I,
And if I only had
wings of a little angel, well
Don't you know, I'd
fly to the top of a mountain and then I'd cry
Walk a mile in my
shoes, walk a mile in my shoes
Babe, before you
abuse, criticize and accuse
Better walk a mile in
my shoes
Try before what you're
doing
Walk a mile in my
shoes, walk a mile in my shoes
Oh, before you abuse,
criticize and accuse
Walk a mile in my
shoes...
No comments:
Post a Comment